Read Part I first. Otherwise, this will lack context.
In short: your mind is a fertile field that will grow your thoughts to fruition on its own. Short-Form Video (SFV), like the content found on TikTok and similar platforms, does two harmful things:
-
It plants its own seeds (images, ideas) by allowing you to passively consume your attention.
-
It fragments your mind, making you unable to sit with or develop your own thoughts/desires concretely enough to plant a seed. This renders your mental field either growing fruit you don't want or lying fallow.
That 'fruit' is your future. SFV ensures the yield is always something you don't want, or nothing. There is no good outcome.
🧐 Addressing the Skeptics
When I discuss the harmful impact of SFV and the risk of a collective barren future, I consistently encounter two pushbacks:
-
What is the evidence that SFV is doing this (fragmenting minds, planting bad seeds)?
-
What is the evidence that 'thoughts' actually yield our futures in the first place?
Both are fair questions that are difficult to conclusively answer, but I can try to make my case here.
🧠 Fragmented Focus (The Digital Doritos)
On fragmentation: clearly something is happening to our collective ability to focus. In 2023, a survey found 25% of non-ADHD diagnosed adults believed they had ADHD. This is one data point, but it strongly resonates with my and my psychiatrist colleagues' experiences in the outpatient setting. We cannot do what we once could cognitively and this seems obvious to essentially everyone, even outside my bubble of mental health professionals.
With Covid-forced screen time increases, notifications, Slacks/Teams, group chats, and life increasingly mediated by a phone, things have massively changed from 10–15 years ago. It’s not social media so much as having finally reached the end stage of "consumption content." We've found the digital Doritos in SFV, and we are as vulnerable to it as our metabolisms were to an abundance of cheap, high calorie-junk food that has made us catastrophically physically unhealthy.
The perfect study doesn't exist to prove this, but my GPT-5-supported experimental design remains free for anyone to steal and publish (see Endnote from Part I). I guarantee it would garner public interest.
I’ll essentially leave the fragmentation question here. If you don't think SFV is deleterious to focus, I'd ask: so what do you think is causing the problem with adults and attention that has very recently emerged? Give me a more likely culprit and I'm happy to be convinced otherwise.
🍎 Outside Desires (Girardian Mimesis Cited Again?!?)
Regarding 'inserting outside desires', again, I can only offer a plausible narrative because I know of no studies that definitively prove (or disprove) my thesis that SFV changes what people want for themselves.
We have the ever-present superficial read: advertising changes behavior (why else would we do it?) and 'sponsored content,' using people you have a parasocial relationship with hawking products can be particularly effective. Then there is pure mimesis, seeing others on SFV like you (or you would like to be like) and wanting what they have or want.
More deeply, there is the thesis that with rapid context changes, your rational mind doesn't have long enough to construct a counterargument to an image or object before the next one appears. But your subconscious still registers the 'thing,' and because you didn't object to it (you didn't have time), on some level, you 'accept' the desire as something you believe or want.
I think even more likely, in terms of influencing the seeds that get planted in your mind fields, SFV just gives you a bunch of random things to throw into the dirt, distracting you from carefully or systematically planting, tending, and harvesting a meaningful crop. It may not make you want Pepsi by force, but it might scramble your brain so thoroughly that when you get thirsty, you won't be able to draw on your genuine wants and only be able to retrieve some splinter jammed into your cerebrum repeatedly by SFV and so 'choose' that. Is it actually your choice?
🤔 The Grand Question: Are Thoughts Enough?
Now, onto the prime problem: are thoughts enough? Okay, you might say, 'I get that SFV has a fragmenting effect, a superficializing, exteriorizing effect, but your belief that 'thoughts yield our future' seems bizarrely new age and non-empirical.'
Alright, well, where DOES your future come from then? If not your repeated thoughts, rehearsed imagery, and concretized desires? Do you have a more grounded, evidence-based thesis? Without any evidence it DOES NOT work, people assume it doesn't/can't work like this, because if it DID work, everyone would be doing it and there would be 'proof.' This is very strange to me.
💡 The Mechanics of Planting
Where does anything come from? Thoughts. It's always thoughts first. An image (a visual thought) of a future life, an invention, a business, a relationship, a job. We think, then feel it, experience the idea, then we can plan, decide, and execute. No thoughts, no execution and no future. Thoughts are the seeds. The nidus of action.
Sure, the execution is extremely important, but on some level, the magic has already happened. To execute means seeds have been planted and tended, and the results are basically already baked in. Problems may happen along the way, making results not guaranteed, but you only have the chance for results after a seed has been planted.
How are thoughts things? How do they get planted? I don't know how thoughts are things -- just that they are. They are real on some astral level, if you can tolerate that type of ambiguity. I can't explain this any more than I can explain that electrons are things. We know they are there, with charge and spin and mass, but where, exactly, are they? They are point particles. And photons? Now we're talking about something both massless and dimensionless. But real nonetheless. I went to graduate school in physics, and wanted to get a PhD in theoretical particle physics, and these concepts are still slippery to me if you try to go down enough levels. The mechanism here matters less than the materialization of your thoughts.
How do they get planted? This is MUCH easier: repetition.
-
Your thought is the seed.
-
Planting and digging is the systematic repetition of the thought, daily pushing it down into the plush soil of your subconscious.
-
The seed is fertilized by the feeling of expectancy of the thought/wish fulfilled. (Remember the F's.)
-
The seed is watered daily with rich, visual imagery of how the thought will manifest. Every detail is seen vividly of the act completed.
-
The land around the planted seeds is tended and protected from weeds and vermin (negative thoughts and external distractions) which are ruthlessly, indefatigably rooted out. (All of this will be dealt with in-depth in my longer piece.)
🌳 The Field Grows Itself
And how, once we've planted and watered and fertilized and pruned and protected our sweet seed, does the ground actually grow it? I do not know. It is a mystery to me. When you put an apple seed in the ground, do you 'grow' the apple tree? No! The soil-and-seed symbiosis is what grows the tree that yields the fruit.
Can you force the seed to grow? No. Can you speed up the growth? No. Can you make a plant grow where a seed wasn't planted? Of course not.
Drought and blight do happen, even when you've done everything right. Sometimes a harvest does not come. But far more common than natural blight is people being unwilling to do the work of planting, tending and, extremely importantly, waiting! The seed/soil grows itself. We give the soil what we want, and it will do the heavy lifting. It will, with patience and faith, show us the way to make it real.
Some believe that our subconscious is a direct connection to the infinite, the divine -- God himself. I don't know what it taps into, but I've experienced the almost eerie realization of thoughts -- seemingly of their own accord -- after I've thought deeply enough about a thing. Regardless, the mechanism matters less than the materialization of your thoughts. They will grow, they will fruit, and it is on you and only you if there is no harvest or a crop you can't stomach.
🛑 The End, My Friend: SFV's Double Trouble
Again, SFV is doubly blocking this planting and harvesting process in our minds. For some, SFV is salting the metaphoric earth - fragmenting minds so badly that the soil becomes essentially unable to make seeds grow. For others, it is just plucking out commercially convenient seeds (SPONSORED CONTENT) and scattering them haphazardly without the work or discipline necessary to have even these alien, inchoate thoughts reach their potential. For all heavy SFV users, it is truncating your future mental bounty. It is either weakly growing something you don't want, or yielding you nothing at all.
Your future is being planted by your thoughts of today. From now on, take that responsibility seriously and grow a life that you want.
Yes, thoughts, used correctly, are enough.